<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Cord Law, LLC &#187; Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerbloghelp.com/tag/star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerbloghelp.com</link>
	<description>Helping Lawyers Create Compelling Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Law and Star Trek</title>
		<link>http://lawyerbloghelp.com/the-law-and-star-trek/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyerbloghelp.com/the-law-and-star-trek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CharmCityLawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerbloghelp.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always wanted to do an article on how Star Trek is referenced in the law.  i09 started the process and listed some good ones in their article on 8 Ways That Judges Have Cited Star Trek From The Bench.   I recall a Supreme Court argument from two years ago, where the issue was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://lawyerbloghelp.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Spock-Mirror.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-154" title="Spock (Mirror)" src="http://lawyerbloghelp.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Spock-Mirror.jpg" alt="" width="259" height="194" /></a>I&#8217;ve always wanted to do an article on how Star Trek is referenced in the law.  i09 started the process and listed some good ones in their article on <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://io9.com/5940680/8-ways-that-judges-have-cited-star-trek-from-the-bench" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">8 Ways That Judges Have Cited Star Trek From The Bench</span></a></span>.  </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I recall a <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/08-1448.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Supreme Court argument from two years ago</span></a></span>, where the issue was whether violence against non-humans in video games was regulated by a California law.  Justice Kagan observed that violence to computer-generated Vulcans would not be covered by the act, merely because of the addition of two pointy ears.  </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyerbloghelp.com/the-law-and-star-trek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
